Sublime Text 2 is a text editor for OS X, Linux and Windows, currently in beta.

0

Drag and drop directories from sidebar into "Find in files"

Rui Rei 11 years ago 0

The title says it all. Would be nice to have this feature, as I think the sidebar is the least exploited asset in ST(3 in my case). Although I find I don't need it as much because of the sweet "go to anything" feature, in this case I think the sidebar could be very useful, and as it is now it is useless (I mean, I can select and open files waaay faster with "go to anything", and that's pretty much all the sidebar can be used for at this point).

0

dna edit: Recovery at what cost?

lachlan 11 years ago 0

http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/1881349/editorial-dna-edit-recovery-at-what-cost


There would come a time when you wish that every aspects of life is as easy as arranging the lines of seven-year-old students.  It is likekindergarten students are more behave than the outside world.  Does school really affect the way we behave when we get older and done with school?


Isn’t the concept of lining up, or waiting your turn, or listening while someone else is speaking, something that is supposed to be hard-wired from the age of five onward, thanks to attending school should be a basic and common etiquette for adults?  Are people “misbehaving” in the adult world was an effect of their schooling when they were younger.


If schooling does indeed have a significant impact on us up until our adult years, how does it manifest itself in the everyday world of being a “grown-up”? And perhaps more importantly, are we thinking of education as a means to a positively practical end as we leave school behind us?

 

Canadians were raising their children and how it was negatively impacting their ability to function once they’d left home to go to university or work. Do not “helicopter parent” your kid rather spend the entire time wondering if it was possible that some of the struggles being discussed weren’t a result of an education that had misfired in shaping these youngsters’ skills sets. Years back, things are better.  Today, students were being pushed through despite not having passed exams then blames the education system for not being the same as it was years before is a bit too get-off-my-lawn.


Before schooling seemed rigid and wildly archaic, meaning learning is far more than any generation. Perhaps it was just a case of an education still being a good fit for the society it hoped to produce at the time.  Or maybe education is an organism in a constant state of flux, and sometimes the growing pains of one generation will greatly benefit the one coming up behind. It all comes down to what a country/people/group wants an education to be.  The students should be more confident and self-aware.  They must think critically to be able to utilize deductive reasoning, to problem solve and so on.  Teach them skills that soon will be able to grow with them, and will evolve into useful tools for navigating their adult lives.  Success is not measured out in numbers on a chart and letters across a table.  The problem is we are all misbehaved, we can all sit nicely in a circle, raise our hands, and wait for our turn to talk.

0

Power to the people

kenzieduncan 11 years ago 0

Power to the people

Technology and development: A growing number of initiatives are promoting bottom-up ways to deliver energy to the world’s poor

AROUND 1.5 billion people, or more than a fifth of the world's population, have no access to electricity, and a billion more have only an unreliable and intermittent supply. Of the people without electricity, 85% live in rural areas or on the fringes of cities. Extending energy grids into these areas is expensive: the United Nations estimates that an average of $35 billion-40 billion a year needs to be invested until 2030 so everyone on the planet can cook, heat and light their premises, and have energy for productive uses such as schooling. On current trends, however, the number of “energy poor” people will barely budge, and 16% of the world's population will still have no electricity by 2030, according to the International Energy Agency.


But why wait for top-down solutions? Providing energy in a bottom-up way instead has a lot to recommend it. There is no need to wait for politicians or utilities to act. The technology in question, from solar panels to low-energy light-emitting diodes (LEDs), is rapidly falling in price. Local, bottom-up systems may be more sustainable and produce fewer carbon emissions than centralised schemes. In the rich world, in fact, the trend is towards a more flexible system of distributed, sustainable power sources. The developing world has an opportunity to leapfrog the centralised model, just as it leapfrogged fixed-line telecoms and went straight to mobile phones.


But just as the spread of mobile phones was helped along by new business models, such as pre-paid airtime cards and village “telephone ladies”, new approaches are now needed. “We need to reinvent how energy is delivered,” says Simon Desjardins, who manages a programme at the Shell Foundation that invests in for-profit ways to deliver energy to the poor. “Companies need to come up with innovative business models and technology.” Fortunately, lots of people are doing just that.


Let there be light


Start with lighting, which prompted the establishment of the first electrical utilities in the rich world. At the “Lighting Africa” conference in Nairobi in May, a World Bank project to encourage private-sector solutions for the poor, 50 lighting firms displayed their wares, up from just a handful last year. This illustrates both the growing interest in bottom-up solutions and falling prices. Prices of solar cells have also fallen, so that the cost per kilowatt is half what it was a decade ago. Solar cells can be used to power low-energy LEDs, which are both energy-efficient and cheap: the cost of a set of LEDs to light a home has fallen by half in the past decade, and is now below $25.


“This could eliminate kerosene lighting in the next ten years, the way cellphones took off in about 13 years,” says Richenda Van Leeuwen of the Energy Access Initiative at the UN Foundation in Washington, DC. That would have a number of benefits: families in the developing world may spend as much as 30% of their income on kerosene, and kerosene lighting causes indoor air pollution and fires.

But such systems are still beyond the reach of the very poorest. “There are hundreds of millions who can afford clean energy, but there is still a barrier for the billions who cannot,” says Sam Goldman, the chief executive of D.light. His firm has developed a range of solar-powered systems that can provide up to 12 hours of light after charging in sunlight for one day. D.light's most basic solar lantern costs $10. But the price would have to fall below $5 to make it universally affordable, according to a study by the International Finance Corporation, an arm of the World Bank. So there is scope for further improvement.


It is not just new technology that is needed, but new models. Much of the ferment in bottom-up energy entrepreneurialism is focusing on South Asia, where 570m people in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, mostly in rural areas, have no access to electricity, according to the International Energy Agency. One idea is to use locally available biomass as a feedstock to generate power for a village-level “micro-grid”. Husk Power Systems, an Indian firm, uses second-world-war-era diesel generators fitted with biomass gasifiers that can use rice husks, which are otherwise left to rot, as a feedstock. Wires are strung on cheap, easy-to-repair bamboo poles to provide power to around 600 families for each generator. Co-founded three years ago by a local electrical engineer, Gyanesh Pandey, Husk has established five mini-grids in Bihar, India's poorest state, where rice is a staple crop. It hopes to extend its coverage to 50 mini-grids during 2010. Consumers pay door-to-door collectors upfront for power, and Husk collects a 30% government subsidy for construction costs. Its pilot plants were profitable within six months, so its model is sustainable.


 RELATED ARTICLE:

http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/news_speeches_20130613_rwt.aspx

http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/environmentandenergy/focus_areas/sustainable-energy.html


0
Not a bug

Monokai Color Scheme seems to be the same as Monokai Bright. I used to like the normal Monokai, existing in the previous version.

Alvaro Alonso Jiménez 13 years ago updated by Jon Skinner 13 years ago 0
I used to like the normal Monokai (not the bright one), existing in the previous version.
I think there is a bug in this sense.
Answer
Jon Skinner 13 years ago
The selection color is different between the two color schemes
0

"Toggle Bookmark" is not working correctly. Cannot clear a bookmark.

Timm 11 years ago 0

This should have high priority, Jon. Enable works, disable works only if you don't move the cursor. If you move around and go back to the line, the bookmark just stays there. Only option is to clear ALL bookmarls. Mac OS X 10.6.8, ST 2.0.2

0

Eight ideas to help you save money

Jhennifer Fink 11 years ago 0
http://www.westhillinsuranceconsulting.com/

1. Review your federal income tax withholding. Make sure that your federal withholding is appropriate for your income and family size. If you’re paying in too little throughout the year, you may owe money at tax time. On the flip side, having too much money withheld from every paycheck means that Uncle Sam gets to put your money to work throughout the year instead of you. Regardless, it’s important to make sure you’re saving throughout the year to manage this expense.


2. Lower your insurance rates. The next time your auto and home insurance policies are up for renewal, shop around to see if you can replace your coverage for less. The savings could be substantial.


3. Refinance your mortgage. Typically, it makes sense to refinance if you can lower your interest rate by at least two percentage points and plan to stay in your home long enough to realize a savings after you factor in closing costs. Keep in mind a large percentage of the payment in the early years pays off the interest on the loan, not the principal. So, if you’ve had the mortgage for a while, refinancing may not be your best bet. An online calculator or a reputable mortgage professional can help you decide.


4. Take the bus or carpool. The cost of gas, wear and tear on your vehicle, tolls and paid parking can add up quickly. If you usually make the daily commute in your vehicle alone, price out the public transportation options in your area. Typically, it’s significantly less expensive than driving. Or consider starting a carpool so that you can share expenses.


5. Consider signing up for a health savings account (HSA) next time open enrollment comes around. If you don’t need a higher level of coverage, an HSA may be a good option for you. An HSA is a tax-advantaged medical savings account that you can use to pay for qualified medical expenses if you are enrolled in a high deductible health plan (HDHP). You – or your employer – can deposit pretax dollars in your HSA. Regardless of who deposits it, all the money in the account is immediately yours. Even better? Your unused HSA balance rolls over from one year to the next. So, if you don’t use it, you don’t lose it.


6. Conduct an energy audit of your home. It can help you determine which improvements will save you the most money and energy. For more information about professional audits – or tips on how to do it yourself if you’re handy –


7. Request a credit card rate reduction. If you’re carrying a substantial balance, call your credit card company and request a rate reduction. If they won’t honor your request, get a zero percent balance transfer to another card you already have, but make sure your rate won’t go higher when it resets. Also, remember that opening a new card could have a negative effect on your credit score. It also may be a good idea limit purchases on your credit card until you’re in better financial health.


8. Give something up. Do you pick up a daily coffee or soda from a specialty shop or convenience store on your way to or from work? If so, consider giving it up. Think quitting a $3.50 a day habit won’t make a difference? It will. If you work 250 days a year, you could save $875 in that given year.
0

A new build system variable $SelectedText

Matt McCray 13 years ago updated 13 years ago 0
It would contain the contents of the currently selected text in the active tab.

Useful for, as an example, selectively transpiling a snippet of CoffeScript without having to scan the results of the entire compiled file's output.
0

Five Myths of Bond Investing: The Michael Shearin Group Morgan Stanley

Amandine Petre 11 years ago 0
Five Myths of Bond Investing

Are bonds a portfolio's bulwark or its Achilles' heel? Investors can't seem to decide

Over the last seven months of 2013, amid rising interest rates and falling bond prices, skittish investors yanked $18 billion more out of bond funds than they put in.

Then, as stocks faltered in the first six weeks of 2014, investors put in over $28 billion more to bond funds than they withdrew.

Adding to the confusion: Wednesday's disclosure that Federal Reserve officials are debating whether to raise interest rates sooner than expected. The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury hit 2.75% on the news, up from 1.62% in May. (Bond yields move in the opposite direction of prices.)

After three decades of a mostly smooth and steady bond market, investors aren't used to the recent volatility. That could be leading some to abandon their portfolios' primary defenses right when they need them the most, experts say.

"Bonds are thought of as a safe haven, but even the safest harbors have waves," says Martin Leibowitz, a managing director of research at Morgan Stanley and co-author of "Inside the Yield Book," considered by investors to be one of the best books ever written on bonds.

Like all areas of investing, the bond market is rife with popular beliefs that are only partly true at best and misleading at worst. If you want to stop lurching from one wrong-footed bond trade to another, it pays to separate myth from reality.

Here is a guide to some of the most dangerous misinformation about investing in bonds and bond funds—along with practical steps you can take to invest wisely on the basis of more-accurate evidence.

Myth No. 1: Bond investors will suffer huge losses when interest rates rise.

Long-term U.S. Treasury bonds lost 12.7% last year as rates rose roughly one percentage point. And manyWall Street strategistsexpect rates to climb this year as the Fed changes course.

Yet losses on that scale across a wide variety of bonds are unlikely. To see why, you need a basic understanding of what pros call "duration."

That measure—available from your fund's website or, if you buy individual bonds, from your broker—shows the approximate percentage change in the price of a bond or bond fund for an immediate one-percentage-point move in interest rates.

The duration of the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, the broadest benchmark for the fixed-income market, was around 5.6 years this past week. Thus, if rates rise one percentage point, the Barclays Aggregate would immediately fall in price by approximately 5.6%; a half-point rise would knock the index down in price by 2.8%, and so on
"For big losses to occur, interest rates would have to rise enormously," says Frank Fabozzi, a bond expert who teaches finance at EDHEC Business School in Paris and Princeton University.

To incur a 20% loss on a bond fund with a duration of 5.6 years, for instance, interest rates would have to rise instantaneously by approximately four percentage points. Even a 10% loss would require an immediate—and historically unprecedented—jump in rates of roughly two points. (Long-term U.S. Treasurys have a duration of more than 16 years, which is why they are so sensitive to rising rates.)


At today's low rates, "you should have lower expectations for total return and yield, but the extent of the potential negative returns has been exaggerated," says Matthew Tucker, head of fixed-income strategy at BlackRock's iShares unit, the largest manager of exchange-traded funds.

That is because, as rates rise, you get to invest the income thrown off by your old bonds at the new, higher yields. As a bond investor, your total return is the sum of any price changes and the income the bonds produce.

Imagine that interest rates rise by a quarter of a percentage point. That would immediately knock about 1.4% off the price of a bond fund with a duration of 5.6 years. But it also would add a quarter-point to the yield of fresh bonds coming into the portfolio, making up over the longer term for the short-term decline in price.

In recently published research, Morgan Stanley's Mr. Leibowitz has shown that so long as a fund (or even a "ladder" of individual bonds assembled to mature at equally spaced intervals of time) maintains a moderate, five-to-six-year duration, the portfolio's annual total return should converge toward its original yield. That assumes that you hold the fund or ladder at least six years.

Remarkably, he found that outcome will occur under almost all possible scenarios, regardless of how much interest rates change.

As a result, Mr. Leibowitz says, "if you are determinedly a long-term investor, you can get through a period of intervening turbulence" comfortable in the knowledge that any losses in market value will be offset over time by the extra income from higher rates.

All this points toward a simple strategy: Ignore the harum-scarum rhetoric about a bond-market bloodbath. For government and investment-grade corporate bonds and bond funds with a duration less than 10 years, that scenario is just a myth.

So long as you keep your duration short—and stick with high-quality bonds—you should be in no danger of anything greater than a temporary, single-digit loss.

Ask yourself what is the worst loss you are willing to withstand on your bond investments for each one-percentage-point rise in interest rates. If that maximum loss is 5%, then you want a bond or bond fund with a duration of five years, slightly shorter than that of the Barclays Aggregate. (The average intermediate-term bond fund, according to Chicago-based investment researcher Morningstar, has a duration of 4.9 years.)

You can get higher yield than the current 2.3% offered by the Barclays Aggregate Index—but only if you are comfortable with higher duration. The Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond VCLT +0.39% ETF, for instance, yields 5%, but its duration is 13.4 years—meaning that a quarter-point rise in rates would trigger a 3.4% short-term decline in price.


0

Select File from Goto using mouse = Sublime Crash

Scott Bowers 13 years ago 0
Ubuntu x64

When I use goto anything (or other goto variants), if I use the mouse and click on the file to open it (or goto a function), sublime instantly crashes.

Please fix.
0

ocaml highlight bug

Aleksey Katargin 12 years ago 0

Ocaml highlight breaks with this code (* '"' *)

Single-qouted double-quote in comments doesnt processed preopertly.