Jon, your comments above (as to why this is declined) are not necessarily so. Consider this:
* I have too many files opened for tabs to be at their optimum width (i.e. titles are truncated).
* Currently: When I close one tab, all tabs rebalance.
* Instead, if you adopt the behaviour whereby the tabs to the left remain static and the tabs to the right fall under my cursor, I can close multiple tabs quickly & easily (as though someone walked in on me editing some cheeky files).
* The close button doesn't need to move under the cursor because I can middle-click it.
* I have too many files opened for tabs to be at their optimum width (i.e. titles are truncated).
* Currently: When I close one tab, all tabs rebalance.
* Instead, if you adopt the behaviour whereby the tabs to the left remain static and the tabs to the right fall under my cursor, I can close multiple tabs quickly & easily (as though someone walked in on me editing some cheeky files).
* The close button doesn't need to move under the cursor because I can middle-click it.
Does this motivate the feature?