Have i missed something because i havent checked thoroghly, but if a tail -f mode (i would imagine this to be a read only function) , combined with the side bar would be the most awesome feature to myself and to the millions of unix support engineers.
What's wrong with having tail -f running in a terminal window next to Sublime Text? I don't get this idea that the same program must do absolutely everything. Do we want Sublime Text to be the new Emacs?
There is no sensible tail -f for Windows.
And searching from plain tail output is a pain, having the same text inside Sublime Text would allow us to use its powerful search tools on the tailed file.
I refuse to disagree, but the use case is simply "poll the file automatically" rather than "poll on focus" if a follow flag is set for the buffer.
yes you can have a tail -f running in a terminal , good for you , go for it, tickle yourself to death with it even :)
BUT i'm not looking for an more integrated alternative solution as i already know about using a terminal window, and all the tail command switches as everyone who can read this thread i imagine.
But to have a function like this in a document window, with syntax highlighting and easily scrollable using the side map view is a feature that would probably sell the product better.
My question to the forum was have this functionality included in the next version as a nice to have.
For you to basically come here and say "whats the point , we can do this instead" is not in the true flavour of helping to make a good piece of software better.
I dont remember writing "sublime text does not have a tail -f function" can anyone help me with an alternative workaround ?
Any ways I posted this 7 + months back and it seems to be drawing some positive attention to a few people so every one if you agree with me write something here.
If you do not have something positive to say on it then go do something else.