+92
Brian Adams 3 years ago • updated by Redwards 1 year ago 10
When recording a macro it would help if it also recorded F3 (finds).  I frequently need to find a token (like and underscore) and delete everything before it.
+18
I agree with this, but I would request that find and replace should be recorded as well (especially including RegEx support)!
+15
Seconding this. Macro-recording search and replace operations is actually my most common desired use of the macro recording feature.
+11
As a TextMate user I thought it was a must have feature, disappointed that it isn't already in Sublime Text.
+2

Yow! I'm surprised this isn't in Sublime. Macro recording should record everything that happens in the buffer.In short, it should record sublime.log_commands(1) and play them back.

+2

Zoiks. Completely agree. As powerful as ST2 is it's a little surprising to bump into these scenarios

Going back to ... Emacs :-)

+4

It's simply not acceptable to pay for an editor not offering this functionality, it's really a shame and even more shocking they did not fix that yet. I deeply regret my choice.

+5

I would not have paid for a license if I'd realized macros couldn't do find/replace.

+3

Please fix this!


I have to work around not having it daily. It's incredibly frustrating and slows me down a significant amount.


I come from textmate but have been using sublime for a year now. I thought I'd find another tool to do what I accomplish with record macro + search, but I haven't.


Please do fix!

+3

I still use ST because of Linux support.  But after months using ST I still use Notepad++ on Windows for heavy editing.  Search is macros is the biggest impediment to using ST.  I'd rather use just one editor but ST isn't it yet.